Dear Joan:
My company has recently instituted a flexible schedule
policy. Any employee wishing to go to a flexible schedule
must get the approval of his/her immediate supervisor, as well as
the department head.
I have the approval of my immediate supervisor to begin
working a compressed workweek (four 10-hour days), but our
department head has denied the request. His reasons are that
it's "not a good time for employees to work less in the current
economic climate," and by letting me change my schedule, it will
"make other employees want to do it, too."
This denial seems unfair to me because of the following:
- I am not asking to “work less.” I am asking
to work the same number of hours over a reduced number of
days. When I pointed this out to him, he said it will be
“perceived as less by our clients and your
co-workers.”
- Several people in our department (including my supervisor) are
working reduced schedules of 30-hours per week in order to have
more time with their families. They are all women with
children. Their schedules were in place (by private agreement
with the department head) before the company policy took
effect.
- Six months ago (after the flexible schedule policy was in
force) another employee, who also works under my supervisor, cut
back her hours by half (with no salary decrease) because she's had
a baby. Our supervisor knows she is doing this, but neither
of them have gotten approval from the department head. The
department head has no idea that this is going on. When this
co-worker found out I was getting ready to request a flexible
schedule, she immediately went to our supervisor, cried, and said
that she needed Fridays off to be at home with her baby. The
supervisor has given her the okay to do this, too, as long as she
can “get away with it.” (By the way, I do
not have children.)
Until now, in spite of what I feel is bad behavior on the part
of the supervisor and co-worker, I’ve managed to have great
relationships with both of them. I have always had excellent
reviews, work hard, and am very dependable. I frequently do
work for the department head, as well, and I am positive that there
is no hidden reason for his denial of my schedule request that has
anything to do with my work habits or personality.
My supervisor has refused to intercede for me with the
department head because she doesn’t want to “rock the
boat.” She is worried that if she helps push for what I
want, everyone else will lose what they have. She has,
though, offered to let me “take a day off here and there,
without telling anyone.” That’s unacceptable to
me, not only because it’s wrong but because I want a schedule
that I can count on in order to do regular volunteer work, take
enrichment classes, etc.
I find myself caught between a clueless department head and a
supervisor who is encouraging employees to lie/cheat.
My questions:
- Talking to the department head again on my own is out of the
question, and there’s no one above him that I can trust to
help/advise me. This is a great company with excellent
benefits, and I don’t want to leave. There is a
grievance procedure, but I’ve never filed a complaint before
and the prospect scares me. I am concerned that a grievance
hearing will only earn me the undying hatred of my co-workers and
the indelible label of “trouble-maker.” Is
a grievance the ultimate bridge-burning? Is there another
route to take?
- Am I being stubborn by not taking the
“under-the-radar” days off my supervisor offered
me? Something is better than nothing, but it’s
something that I can’t feel good about. It’s only
a matter of time before someone (even if it’s not me) gets
angry enough to blow the whistle, and I don’t want to be
accused of wrongdoing.
- If the best answer is “Do nothing until you can find
another job,” how do I cope with the resentment and
disillusionment I feel at trying to do the right thing while others
are working the system to get what they want? I already feel
so bitter and angry.
Answer:
Your supervisor’s “under the radar” actions
are disingenuous—at best. There is no easy way out. By
letting employees violate the policy-- that the department head
clearly wants to enforce—it is putting everyone at risk.
What’s worse, she is bending the rules in different ways for
different people. I’m sure you are outraged that you have to
pay the price so she and others won’t be “found
out”.
What’s worse, your supervisor is letting people cheat
the company. She isn’t applying flexible scheduling
appropriately. Your request is simply rearranging your 40 hours. In
your co-worker’s case she is working half time for full pay
and benefits, which sounds like stealing to me.
Your supervisor is trying to be the ‘nice guy’ but
her actions are insubordinate and unethical—or worse.
It’s clear she disagrees with the department head and feels
he is being unfair and outdated in his views. (In fact, I agree
that he is missing the boat on the benefits of flexible
scheduling—when it is applied equitably.)
Because she is cutting all these side deals under the radar,
someone is going to blow the whistle eventually—whether
it’s you or someone else. This won’t end well,
regardless.
Since you have already gone to the department head and been
denied, there isn’t much you can do. If you do file a
grievance, think through the ramifications and your end goal
first. If you want to expose the injustice, a grievance will
probably do that. So will a visit to the Human Resources
Department. You could ask HR to keep your name out of it and ask
them to do their own investigation, but there is never a guarantee
that they will honor that. You could write an anonymous letter to
HR, which would also trigger an investigation.
The department head will investigate and your supervisor will
be in hot water. Heads may roll.
I think you are right in assuming your coworkers would be
angry. Your supervisor would also be angry. In the end, would the
policy be more fairly administered? Hopefully, but I suspect the
department head would see to it that no one had flex time, so in
the end you may not get what you want anyway.
Am I saying not to grieve it or write an anonymous letter, or
go to HR? No. But in any case there will be ramifications. Even in
the case of an anonymous letter your colleagues would probably
assume you were the author.
I can’t make this decision for you, but one thing is
clear. You are an honest employee who understands what is right and
wrong. I applaud you for not being willing to cross the line.